'Roadability' defects found in 17% of intermodal chassis
inspected
"Trailer Talk" blog by Tom Berg, Senior Editor
Federal and state inspectors are not finding a lot of "roadability" problems with container chassis, according to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's chief safety officer, Jack Van Steenburg. And while new rules require that owners perform maintenance, drivers and carriers still have some responsibilities.
Of 37,000 chassis checked in roadside inspections and in yards, 17% were placed out of service. These were done in the past several years, and have continued since new roadability requirements went into effect last December, Van Steenburg told an audience at last week's fall meeting of the ATA's Technology & Maintenance Council.
The roadability regs require maintenance to be done by owners of chassis, sometimes called intermodal equipment providers, or IEPs. Formerly, companies using the chassis and their drivers were cited for equipment defects, and for years they complained about it.
"The biggest complaint from carriers and drivers is that the intermodal provider is not giving them proper equipment, and we are making them do their job," said Van Steenburg, who spent 25 years with the New York State Patrol before joining FMCSA.
Chassis owners must register with FMCSA, and 111 have done so. By contrast, the agency regulates 550,000 motor carriers.
In the first year, many inspections of intermodal chassis were considered unfair because managers and drivers didn't understand requirements, he said. So the agency switched to "educational" inspections.
Even so, chassis inspections didn't always go smoothly: The Teamsters didn't co-operate and managers resisted. Those in charge of a railroad's intermodal yard outside of Chicago refused to allow inspectors in, but relented when told by phone that the law required them to, he said. Inspectors now call ahead to smooth their entry.
While maintenance is now the job of IEPs, drivers and carriers still have responsibilities, Van Steenburg said. Drivers are supposed to do pre-trip inspections and report any defects they can see during a walk-around check. They do not have to crawl under the chassis to check the brakes and such, though whether maladjusted brakes can be spotted during the walk-around is sometimes debated.
As before the new regulations, a driver can ask that the chassis be fixed or refuse it and ask for another.
If an inspecting officer later finds a defect that should have been spotted during the walk-around, he can cite the driver and/or the carrier. If the driver admits that he didn't do the pre-trip inspection, he can also be cited for that.
Carriers can be fined up to $2,100 for a records-keeping violation, Van Steenburg said.
The main defects found have been non-working stop and turn-signal lights, then containers not secured -- "a common sense thing," in Van Steenburg's view -- then flat tires and out-of-adjustment brakes.
Please feel free to comment to any of the posts on this blog. The intent is to start discussions on the subject content. If you have articles for post or comments about the blog in general please contact: preferred.logistics1@gmail.com preferred.logistics2@gmail.com preferred.logistics@gmail.com Thank you Preferred Logistics
"Trailer Talk" blog by Tom Berg, Senior Editor
Federal and state inspectors are not finding a lot of "roadability" problems with container chassis, according to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's chief safety officer, Jack Van Steenburg. And while new rules require that owners perform maintenance, drivers and carriers still have some responsibilities.
Of 37,000 chassis checked in roadside inspections and in yards, 17% were placed out of service. These were done in the past several years, and have continued since new roadability requirements went into effect last December, Van Steenburg told an audience at last week's fall meeting of the ATA's Technology & Maintenance Council.
The roadability regs require maintenance to be done by owners of chassis, sometimes called intermodal equipment providers, or IEPs. Formerly, companies using the chassis and their drivers were cited for equipment defects, and for years they complained about it.
"The biggest complaint from carriers and drivers is that the intermodal provider is not giving them proper equipment, and we are making them do their job," said Van Steenburg, who spent 25 years with the New York State Patrol before joining FMCSA.
Chassis owners must register with FMCSA, and 111 have done so. By contrast, the agency regulates 550,000 motor carriers.
In the first year, many inspections of intermodal chassis were considered unfair because managers and drivers didn't understand requirements, he said. So the agency switched to "educational" inspections.
Even so, chassis inspections didn't always go smoothly: The Teamsters didn't co-operate and managers resisted. Those in charge of a railroad's intermodal yard outside of Chicago refused to allow inspectors in, but relented when told by phone that the law required them to, he said. Inspectors now call ahead to smooth their entry.
While maintenance is now the job of IEPs, drivers and carriers still have responsibilities, Van Steenburg said. Drivers are supposed to do pre-trip inspections and report any defects they can see during a walk-around check. They do not have to crawl under the chassis to check the brakes and such, though whether maladjusted brakes can be spotted during the walk-around is sometimes debated.
As before the new regulations, a driver can ask that the chassis be fixed or refuse it and ask for another.
If an inspecting officer later finds a defect that should have been spotted during the walk-around, he can cite the driver and/or the carrier. If the driver admits that he didn't do the pre-trip inspection, he can also be cited for that.
Carriers can be fined up to $2,100 for a records-keeping violation, Van Steenburg said.
The main defects found have been non-working stop and turn-signal lights, then containers not secured -- "a common sense thing," in Van Steenburg's view -- then flat tires and out-of-adjustment brakes.
Please feel free to comment to any of the posts on this blog. The intent is to start discussions on the subject content. If you have articles for post or comments about the blog in general please contact: preferred.logistics1@gmail.com preferred.logistics2@gmail.com preferred.logistics@gmail.com Thank you Preferred Logistics
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hello,
I appreciate your comments regarding this blog. I welcome your suggestions and would appreciate you additions to this blog.
The focus of this blog has changed beginning October 1,2011. Logisitcs and Supply Chain dynamics will be the focus.
Our website is www.preferredlogistics.biz